The term Chief Justice of India refers to the highest judge in the Supreme Court of India. This also makes it the highest judicial position obtainable by a judge in India. The Chief Justice not only heads the administrative functions of the Supreme Court but also sits actively as a presiding judge in Court No. 1 of the Supreme Court of India.
On the administrative side, the Chief Justice carries out the following functions;
- allocation of matters to various other judges of the Supreme Court
- maintenance of roaster
- appointment of court officials
- general and other miscellaneous matters relating to supervision and functioning of the Supreme Court.
As the chief judge, the Chief Justice is also responsible for the allocation of cases and appointment of constitutional benches which deal with important matters of law. In terms of Article 145 of the Constitution of India and the Supreme Court Rules of Procedure of 1966, the Chief Justice allocates the work to the other judges who are bound to refer the matter to him in case they require the matter to be looked into by a bench of higher strength.
Appointment of Chief Justice of India
Under the Constitution of India, in terms of Article 124 the manner of appointment of the judges to the Supreme Court was provided. However there was no specific provision as to the appointment of the Chief Justice to the Supreme Court. Therefore the process for the appointment of the judges to the Supreme Court was followed for the Chief Justice as well. This in practice meant that the most senior judge in the Supreme Court would be proposed by the Government of India to the President who would approve the same and thus the Chief Justice would be appointed. Here seniority did not mean the age but meant the seniority within the Supreme Court. Therefore the judge with the most experience in the Supreme Court was generally nominated by the Government and he would be appointed as the Chief Justice.
However this convention was breach on a number of occasions, most notable of which was the appointment of Chief Justice A.N. Ray who was appointed as the Chief Justice superseding three judges who were senior to him. This was done during the time when Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister of India. This was allegedly done as he was considered liberal and understood to be supporting the government in its actions and Indira Gandhi, who at that times was facing constitutional crisis, with her appointment being challenged by activist Raj Narain and major legal barriers remained to her continuance as the Prime Minister.
After the Emergency, the Supreme Court in a series of historical decisions conferred a lot of powers to itself. One of these was the declaration (in the constitutional bench S.P. Gupta - II case) that the Government of India would be bound to nominate only the senior-most judge of the Supreme Court for the position of Chief Justice, thereby ruling out any possible abuse by the Government or its ability to influence the judiciary. Since then the convention has been followed without any exceptions.
Once appointed, the Chief Justice remains in office until his retirement or unless removed by impeachment or by resignation.
Trivia
- In terms of Article 60 of the Constitution of India the Chief Justice of India administers oath of office to the President of India.
- In the absence of the Vice-President of India and the President of India, it is the Chief Justice who serves as the Acting-President of India.
- The Chief Justice is the ex-officio Chancellor/Visitor to most autonomous law schools in India
- There has been no female Chief Justice of India till date. Justice Ruma Pal, who was appointed as the judge of the Supreme Court on January 28, 2000 could have been the first female Chief Justice of India had she been appointed two days earlier. However on January 26, 2000, Justice Y.K. Sabharwal was appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court and thus he acquired seniority over her by two days and went on to become the Chief Justice of India.
- Justice H. J. Kania who became the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was in fact the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of India, which was the predecessor to the Supreme Court of India, before being transferred to and being appointed the Chief Justice of India.
Chief Justices of Supreme Court of India
| No. |
Name |
Took office |
Left office |
Originating State |
Major decisions during tenure as Chief Justice |
| 01 |
H. J. Kania |
August 15, 1947 |
November 16, 1951 |
Bombay (now Maharashtra) |
| 02 |
M. P. Sastri |
November 16, 1951 |
January 3, 1954 |
Madras (now Tamil Nadu) |
| 03 |
Mehr Chand Mahajan |
January 3, 1954 |
December 22, 1954 |
Lahore/Kashmir |
| 04 |
B. K. Mukherjea |
December 22, 1954 |
January 31, 1956 |
West Bengal |
| 05 |
Sudhi Ranjan Das |
January 31, 1956 |
September 30, 1959 |
West Bengal |
| 06 |
Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sinha |
September 30, 1959 |
January 31, 1964 |
Bihar |
| 07 |
P. B. Gajendragadkar |
January 31, 1964 |
March 15, 1966 |
Bombay (now Maharashtra) |
| 08 |
A. K. Sarkar |
March 16, 1966 |
June 29, 1966 |
West Bengal |
| 09 |
K. Subba Rao |
June 30, 1966 |
April 11, 1967 |
Madras (now Tamil Nadu) |
| 10 |
K. N. Wanchoo |
April 12, 1967 |
February 24, 1968 |
Uttar Pradesh |
| 11 |
M. Hidayatullah |
February 25, 1968 |
December 16, 1970 |
present Chattisgarh |
| 12 |
J. C. Shah |
December 17, 1970 |
January 21, 1971 |
present Gujarat |
| 13 |
S. M. Sikri |
January 22, 1971 |
April 25, 1973 |
Punjab |
| 14 |
A. N. Ray |
April 25, 1973 |
January 28, 1977 |
West Bengal |
| 15 |
Mirza Hameedullah Beg |
January 29, 1977 |
February 21, 1978 |
Uttar Pradesh |
| 16 |
Y. V. Chandrachud |
February 22, 1978 |
July 11, 1985 |
Bombay (now Maharashtra) |
| 17 |
P. N. Bhagwati |
July 12, 1985 |
December 20, 1986 |
Bombay (now Maharashtra) |
| 18 |
R. S. Pathak |
December 21, 1986 |
June 6, 1989 |
Uttar Pradesh |
| 19 |
E. S. Venkataramiah |
June 19, 1989 |
December 17, 1989 |
Mysore (now Karnataka) |
| 20 |
S. Mukharji |
December 18, 1989 |
September 25, 1990 |
West Bengal |
| 21 |
Ranganath Misra |
September 25, 1990 |
November 24, 1991 |
Orissa |
| 22 |
Kamal Narain Singh |
November 25, 1991 |
December 12, 1991 |
Uttar Pradesh |
| 23 |
M. H. Kania |
December 13, 1991 |
November 17, 1992 |
Maharashtra |
| 24 |
L. M. Sharma |
November 18, 1992 |
February 11, 1993 |
Bihar |
| 25 |
M. N. Venkatachaliah |
February 12, 1993 |
October 24, 1994 |
Karnataka |
| 26 |
A. M. Ahmadi |
October 25, 1994 |
March 24, 1997 |
Gujarat |
| 27 |
J. S. Verma |
March 25, 1997 |
January 18, 1998 |
Madhya Pradesh |
| 28 |
M. M. Punchhi |
January 18, 1998 |
October 9, 1998 |
Punjab |
| 29 |
A. S. Anand |
October 10, 1998 |
November 1, 2001 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
| 30 |
S. P. Bharucha |
November 2, 2001 |
May 6, 2002 |
Maharashtra |
| 31 |
B. N. Kirpal |
May 6, 2002 |
November 11, 2002 |
Delhi |
| 32 |
G. B. Pattanaik |
November 11, 2002 |
December 19, 2002 |
Orissa |
| 33 |
V. N. Khare |
December 19, 2002 |
May 2, 2004 |
Uttar Pradesh |
| 34 |
Rajendra Babu |
May 2, 2004 |
June 1, 2004 |
Karnataka |
| 35 |
R. C. Lahoti |
June 1, 2004 |
November 1, 2005 |
Uttar Pradesh |
| 36 |
Y. K. Sabharwal |
November 1, 2005 |
January 14, 2007 |
Delhi |
Land Ceiling Case (M.C. Mehta v. Union of India) |
| 37 |
K. G. Balakrishnan |
January 14, 2007 |
(incumbent) |
Kerala |
reservation case (Youth for Equality v. Union of India) |
Other notable judges
Since the appointment to the office of the Chief Justice of India has been by convention on basis of seniority, the procedure has been criticised by various jurists and cosntitutional experts as being averse to talent and non-recognition of leading abilities. On this count various judges of the Supreme Court are named who showed inspiring leadership ability but because of the seniority rule could not become the Chief Justice of India. Some of these names have been;
See also
External links
No comments have been added.