David Gauntlett (born 1971) is a sociologist specialising in the study of contemporary media audiences, and the role of media in shaping self-identity. He took his PhD and then taught at the University of Leeds, UK, from 1993 to 2002, then was appointed Professor of Media and Audiences at Bournemouth University, UK. In 2006 he joined the School of Media, Arts and Design at University of Westminster, London, as Professor of Media and Communications.
Gauntlett's critique of media 'effects' studies sparked controversy in 1995 [1] [2], and since then he has published a number of books and research on the role of popular media in people's lives [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. In particular he has focused on the way in which digital media is changing the experience of media in general [9] [10] [11] [12].
Since the late 1990s he has produced the website Theory.org.uk [13].
In 2007, he was shortlisted for the 'Young Academic Author of the Year' award in the Times Higher awards [14]. (Ultimately the award was won by historian Richard Toye).
Contents |
This approach asks participants to make something as part of the research process [15]. Gauntlett's work of this kind began with Video Critical (1997) [16], in which children were asked to make videos about the environment, and then in a number of projects which are discussed in Creative Explorations (2007) [17]. As well as studies in which participants have been invited to make video, diaries, collage, and drawings, Gauntlett has explored the use of Lego Serious Play as a tool in sociology and social research [18]. This approach makes use of metaphor and invites participants to build metaphorical models of their identities. The process of making something, and then reflecting upon it, is claimed to give a more nuanced insight into participants' feelings or experiences [17] [19].
This work has been supported by awards from the Arts and Humanities Research Council [20] [21].
In 2007, Gauntlett published online the article Media Studies 2.0, which created some discussion amongst media studies educators [22] [23] [24] [9] [25] [26] [27]. The article argues that the traditional form of media studies teaching and research fails to recognise the changing media landscape in which the categories of 'audiences' and 'producers' blur together, and in which new research methods and approaches are needed. Andy Ruddock has written that Gauntlett's "ironic polemic" includes "much to value", and acknowledges that the argument "is more strategy than creed", but argues that audiences still exist, and experience mass media specifically as audience, and so it would be premature to dispose of the notion of 'audience' altogether[28]. Ruddock also connects the work with earlier and more rigorous critiques of audience studies such as those by Sonia Livingstone of the London School of Economics. Not everyone in the academic community was impressed with Gauntlett's work in this area, with one comment on the MECSSA discussion board reading, 'Isn't it odd that whenever someone purportedly identifies a new paradigm, they see themselves as already a leading practitioner of it ?'
Now with discussions around Web 3.0, identified by McKinsey as a return of knowledge to the experts (see the Financial Times, June 2008) it will be of interest to see how this applied to media studies.
No comments have been added.