Richard Dannatt

Francis Richard Dannatt
23 December 1950 -
General Sir Richard Dannatt KCB, CBE, MC
Place of birth	Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
Allegiance	United Kingdom
Service/branch	British Army
Years of service	1971 –
Rank	General
Commands held	Green Howards 4th Armoured Brigade 3rd (UK) Division Allied Rapid Reaction Corps Land Command
Battles/wars	Kosovo Iraq War
Awards	Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath Commander of the Order of the British Empire Military Cross Queen's Commendation for Valuable Service

General Sir Francis Richard Dannatt KCB, CBE, MC (born 23 December 1950) is the Chief of the General Staff, the professional head of the British Army.

Contents 1 Early life 2 Army career 3 Daily Mail interview, October 2006 3.1 Comments on the British Army in Iraq 3.2 "Christian values" and "the Islamist threat" in Britain 3.3 Overall reaction 4 Prince Harry and Iraq 5 Comments on the Iraqi Resistance/Insurgency 6 Block on promotion to head of British armed forces 7 Private life 8 References 9 External links

Early life

The son of an architect, he was born in Chelmsford in Essex on 23 December 1950. He was educated at Felsted School and St. Lawrence College, Ramsgate. He also attended Hatfield College, Durham University, where he was elected president of the Durham Union Society, graduating with a Bachelor of Arts in Economic History.

Army career

Dannatt was commissioned into The Green Howards regiment in 1971. He has served with the 1st Battalion in Northern Ireland (where he was awarded the Military Cross), Cyprus and Germany and commanded the Battalion in the Airmobile role from 1989 to 1991. From 1994 to 1996 he commanded 4th Armoured Brigade in Germany and Bosnia. He took command of the 3rd (United Kingdom) Division in January 1999, and also served in Kosovo that year as Commander British Forces.

In 2000 he returned to Bosnia as the Deputy Commander Operations of the Stabilisation Force (SFOR). From 2001 to 2002 he was the Assistant Chief of the General Staff in the Ministry of Defence before taking command of NATO's Allied Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC). In March 2005 he took over as Commander-in-Chief, Land Command and assumed the appointment of Chief of the General Staff in August 2006, replacing General Sir Mike Jackson.

Daily Mail interview, October 2006

Comments on the British Army in Iraq

Based on an interview published October 13, 2006 in the Daily Mail,^{[1] [2][3]} some political activists have claimed that General Dannatt publicly called for the withdrawal of British forces from Iraq, stating that their presence "exacerbates the security problems" for the United Kingdom worldwide. Following extensive publicity about the Daily Mail interview he gave an interview on BBC radio and stated that when he talked about pulling out of Iraq "sometime soon", he meant that "when the mission is substantially done we should leave".^[3] He explained: "We don't want to be there another two, three, four, five years. We've got to think about this in terms of a reasonable length of time." He also qualified the "exacerbate" comment by saying that the problem was "not right across the country", but in only parts of it. 10 Downing Street's spokesman stated that General Dannatt was "actually saying what government policy is: we don't want to be there any longer than we have to, but ultimately that is a decision for the Iraqi government." The White House issued a similar statement. Kamran Karadahi, spokesman for Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, called for the troops to stay: "They are still needed very much to help Iraq. The British troops in the south have done a very good job and are still doing so."^[3]

In the Daily Mail interview General Dannatt also questioned the political aims of the Iraq mission: "I think history will show that the planning for what happened after the initial successful war fighting phase was poor, probably based more on optimism than sound planning." He added: "The original intention was that we put in place a liberal democracy that was an exemplar for the region, was pro West and might have a beneficial effect on the balance within the Middle East." He speculated: "That was the hope, whether that was a sensible or naïve hope history will judge. I don’t think we are going to do that. I think we should aim for a lower ambition."

"Christian values" and "the Islamist threat" in Britain

An evangelical^[4] Anglican,^[5] Gen. Dannatt called for a return to traditional Judeo-Christian values in order to counter "the Islamist threat" within British society.^[6] In the same Daily Mail interview, he said: "When I see the Islamist threat in this country I hope it doesn't make undue progress because there is a moral and spiritual vacuum in this country." British society, he said, "has always been embedded in Christian values; once you have pulled the anchor up there is a danger that our society moves with the prevailing wind." In his view, "There is an element of the moral compass spinning. I think it is up to society to realise that is the situation we are in." He identified aspects of radical Islam as the heart of the matter: "We can't wish the Islamist challenge to our society away and I believe that the army both in Iraq and Afghanistan and probably wherever we go next, is fighting the foreign dimension of the challenge to our accepted way of life." It is important, he added, "to face up to the Islamist threat, to those who act in the name of Islam and in a perverted way try to impose Islam by force on societies that do not wish it." He concluded: "It is said that we live in a post Christian society. I think that is a great shame. The broader Judeo-Christian tradition has underpinned British society. It underpins the British Army."

Overall reaction

General Dannatt's comments have received a measure of support in the British Army and amongst retired generals, including former Chief of the Defence Staff, Field Marshal the Lord Bramall.^[7] Others are less supportive. The former Home Secretary David Blunkett, for instance, has also criticised Gen. Dannatt for "interfering" in politics, saying it was a "constitutional" issue.^[8] An ICM opinion poll for the 15 October 2006 edition of the Sunday Express showed that 71 per cent of the British people believed General Dannatt was right to say that the British presence in Iraq was exacerbating the security situation there. 74 per cent agreed that British soldiers should leave Iraq "some time soon", 57 per cent agreed with Gen. Dannatt's view that "Islamists" were exploiting a "moral vacuum" in British society, and 44 per cent also wanted to see the British Army play a greater role in fighting "Islamic extremism" in Britain.^[9]

Prince Harry and Iraq

On 16 May 2007, Dannatt made the decision to restrict Prince Harry from being deployed to Iraq with the rest of his Blues and Royals squadron. He said that during his prior week of visiting to Iraq he had experienced the threats that would occur in Iraq for the Prince, he decided to reassess whether or not to deploy Harry. He said 'there was too great a risk, not only to himself but the people with him'. He therefore came to the conclusion, subsequently, not to let Prince Harry go on his tour of Iraq with the rest of his troops. Conversely in 2008 Prince Harry was able to secretly take part in operations in Afghanistan.^[10]

Comments on the Iraqi Resistance/Insurgency

In September 2007, during a speech to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, Dannatt made remarks that, once again, seemed to put him at odds with the Army's political leadership:

The militants (and I use the word deliberately because not all are insurgents, or terrorists, or criminals; they are a mixture of them all) are well armed – probably with outside help, and probably from Iran. By motivation, essentially, and with the exception of the Al Qaeda in Iraq element who have endeavoured to exploit the situation for their own ends, our opponents are Iraqi Nationalists, and are most concerned with their own needs – jobs, money, security – and the majority are not bad people.^[11]

Block on promotion to head of British armed forces

In June 2008 the Sunday Times reported that Dannatt's expected routine promotion to Chief of the Defence Staff had been personally blocked by Prime Minister Gordon Brown "because of his repeated calls for better pay and conditions for servicemen"^[12]

Private life

Dannatt married in 1977 and has three sons and one daughter. His recreations are tennis, cricket, rugby football, skiing, fishing, shooting and reading.^[13]

References

External links

• Christian Science Monitor: British general's remarks spur Iraq debate
• Profile on MOD site
• Profile on NATO site
• BBC Radio 4 Today Programme interview with General Dannatt, October 13, 2006

Military offices
Preceded by Sir Timothy Granville-Chapman	Commander-in-Chief, Land Command 2005–2006	Succeeded by Sir Redmond Watt
Preceded by Sir Mike Jackson	Chief of the General Staff 2006–	Incumbent

v • d • e Chiefs of the General Staff of the British Army Chiefs of the Imperial General Staff Sir William Nicholson • Sir John French • Sir Charles Douglas • Sir James Murray • Sir Archibald Murray • Sir William Robertson • Sir Henry Wilson • Lord Cavan • Sir George Milne • Sir Archibald Montgomery-Massingberd • Sir Cyril Deverell • Viscount Gort • Sir Edmund Ironside • Sir John Dill • Sir Alan Brooke • Viscount Montgomery • Sir William Slim • Sir John Harding • Sir Gerald Templer • Sir Francis Festing • Sir Richard Hull Chiefs of the General Staff Sir Richard Hull • Sir James Cassels • Sir Geoffrey Baker • Sir Michael Carver • Sir Peter Hunt • Sir Roland Gibbs • Sir Edwin Bramall • Sir John Stanier • Sir Nigel Bagnall • Sir John Chapple • Sir Peter Inge • Sir Charles Guthrie • Sir Roger Wheeler • Sir Michael Walker • Sir Mike Jackson • Sir Richard Dannatt

Persondata
NAME	Dannatt, Richard
ALTERNATIVE NAMES	Dannatt, Francis Richard (full name)
SHORT DESCRIPTION	Chief of the British General Staff
DATE OF BIRTH	23 December 1950
PLACE OF BIRTH	Chelmsford, Essex, England
DATE OF DEATH	living
PLACE OF DEATH

---

No comments have been added.

Your name:
City:
Country:	USA UK India Pakistan UAE Saudi Arabia Germany Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burund Cambodia Cameroon Canada Central African Rep Chad Chile China Columbia Comoros Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic DR Congo Denmark Djiboutil Dominica Dominican Rep Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Eq Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Grenadines Guatemala Guinea Bissau Guinea Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia Macau Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nauru Nepal Neth Antilles Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea Norway Oman Pakistan Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Rawanda Romania Russia Sao Tome Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Korea South Africa Spain Sri Lanka St Kitts_Nevis St Lucia Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvala UAE Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Western Samoa Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe
Your comments:
Security check * (Please enter the number into adjoining box)