Talk:Arthur Andersen

All you want to know about Talk:Arthur Andersen

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve tax-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-priority on the Project's priority scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's comments page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.
This article is within the scope of the Business WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to business-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Start rated as start-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

"Arthur Andersen realized, before the rest of the Big Five, that business consulting was a very lucrative business."

Big Five? Needs to explain who the Big Five are, I have no idea who the other four are.


I know I wrote this stub, but looking at it after a little while, I have to say it's rather Zenlike. --The Cunctator


Any info on founder Arthur Andersen? If so, could rename company article to "Arthur Andersen LLP" --Rj 21:05, Mar 31, 2004 (UTC)

Andersen.com

Hey, Andersen.com is not functional - it just has a dummy welcome page. Does the company still exist?

It is included on the List of notable business failures--anon

Yes, Arthur Andersen, LLP is still in business, never declared bankruptcy and operates the Q Center (a conference facility available for rental).

After Andersen, who's next?

Re the punishment handed out to Arthur Andersen - in this case for the audit of Enron.

Andersen was a victim of a culture that doesn’t support financial audit. This is a crucial matter for debate, as the IMF now hopes to overcome the resistance of local politics to financial stability globally.

As for the wasted money in the European Union, the director-general of Internal Audit there was warned: “We have ways of breaking people like you”.

Under some pressure last year, the UK government issued a consultation document to try to change the loose culture among public servants. This document, the draft Civil Service Bill, may come to nought; but significantly it is the first time in 150 years that such a legislative step to control public spending was thought necessary. Things must be bad.

There is little political will to protect financial audit that acts for taxpayers. Arthur Andersen became victims of this attitude - who's next? Incidentally, there's no international forum to address this abuse, in what is a global economy.

The largest of the Big 5 ?????????

If there is any truth in this, it almost certainly applies to the U.S. practice only. Calsicol 12:11, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

The Big 4 article says it was the smallest, which is more in line with what I thought, but I'll change it to just "one of" Calsicol 12:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes, before sister company Andersen Consulting (now Accenture) severed ties with Andersen Worldwide, S.C. (AWO), the umbrella organization that contained the Arthur Andersen (AA) and Andersen Consulting (AC) entities.

Athur Andersen?

Just wondering: why is is the title of this page 'Arthur Andersen' and doesn't it have the name the firm used for at least the last two years (or so) it exsisted: Andersen? The logo shown on the page is also the Andersen version.. Q300r bc2 07:01, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Andersen was never the legal name of the Firm; it had never changed from Arthur Andersen, LLP. Shortening it to just Andersen was a marketing decision.

Athur Andersen

During the last two years under Andersen name, the firm actively promoted its relation with Internet commerce that sunk in 2001 and tried to settle the issues after separation with Accenture. So Andersen wasn’t the good old Arthur Andersen, but rather the new firm. The real value that was lost, was what came from Arthur Andersen.

News?

I dont't see what's the use of this link to News Trove. It looks more like hidden advertising.

Fair use rationale for Image:AndersenLogo.gif

Image:AndersenLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

How Ironic...

If the text of the company history is to be believed, Arthur Anderson was founded on honesty, integrity and fair-dealing throughout it's 85-year history. How ironic that this firm's name is now regarded as synonymous with crooked accounting in Corporate America.Landroo 12:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Not Ironic - its tragic. People think the AA connected with crooked accounting because they are uninformed. For example, your comments indicate that you think AA was a company. This is not true. It was just a partnership of many independent small firms working under the same name. A few individuals at one firm did some very bad stuff, then the good names of hundreds of innocent and unrelated people got dragged through the mud. 24.222.54.66 (talk) 18:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, the above is not quite true either. While the local partnerships operated with some autonomy, they were far more interconnected than a mere grouping of 'independent small firms working under the same name.' For instance, ALL complex decisions made by local managers were reviewed by the Professional Standards Group (PSG), which acted with significant central authority. In fact, the PSG objected to many of the Enron decisions made locally in Houston, but contrary to AA policy, local Houston managers not only refused to implement their decisions, they sometimes directly lied and stated the PSG agreed. And it was more than a 'few' people who did bad things. Enron, WorldCom, Sunbeam and Baptist were all managed by different groups. All acted unethically and illegally. So a good case can be made the AA encouraged a culture of shady accounting practices throughout the enterprise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.65.192.1 (talk) 19:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm looking for ex coworkers who used to work at AA at the D.C. branch Faragut North. If anyone knows of the employee who goes by the Initials M.M.C please her I love her! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.85.238.204 (talk) 14:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


No comments have been added.



Your name:

City:

Country:

Your comments:

Security check *
(Please enter the number into adjoining box)

 
  • Ads

           
eXTReMe Tracker