Jaap Vermeulen. Jacoplane (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights)
|
|
for removal of the Squid vandal --- Tawker
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar: I know this will mess up your userpage layout but...couldn't help it :P soumসৌমোyasch
|
This Barnstar is awarded to you for your awesome work on implementing the CVG template. Aguerriero
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This user has been on Wikipedia for
4 years, and 9 days. |
|
 |
This user has been an admin for
2 years, 10 months, and 24 days. |
|
|
|
| AJAX |
This user supports
AFC Ajax
Joden!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all of the work you've put into revamping the pages relating to the CVG WikiProject, as well as hunting down and tagging hundreds of articles, I award you this CVG Barnstar! -- PresN 18:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
|
|
|
I think You rock Jacoplane!Protect On!!! BarnStar Boy 22:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
|
|
|
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Video Games Newsletter |
|
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.
|
- Project At a Glance
As of October 2008, the project has:
- Changes to Featured and Good articles, lists, and topics
|
Promoted FA/FL:
 Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings, Crush (video game), Half-Life 2: Episode One, StarCraft: Ghost
Promoted FT:
 StarCraft titles
Demoted FA/FL/FT:
 None
|
Promoted GA:
 Aether (video game), Chris Metzen, Doom 3, Final Fantasy VII, Half-Life 2: Survivor, Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver, Mega Man 2, Silent Hill 3
Promoted GT:
 Key visual novels
Demoted GA/GT:
 Final Fantasy (video game)
|
- News
|
- Feature: Partnered reviews
For some time now, the Video games project and the Military history project have been cross listing their articles undergoing peer review in an effort to improve the quality of articles, as well as the copy editing skills of editors. The idea was first proposed by User:Krator as a way to better prepare articles for Featured article candidacy. After being approved by both projects, the idea was implemented under a trial period, and eventually approved as a standard practice.
New, cross listed military history articles are announced on the Video games project talk page, and listed on the Video games Peer review page under a special section. Video game editors are encouraged to leave any type of comments that come to mind. If you don't know anything about military history, that's perfectly fine because that's the point. An editor lacking knowledge about the particular topic can provide a helpful point of view as a general reader—the intended audience.
If you have a video game article undergoing peer review that you think would benefit from an outside view, post the following boilerplate at WT:MILHIST: {{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/Toolbox/Partner peer review notice|Name of article|Raw link to review|Video games}} ~~~~
- Things to remember
- A peer review process such as this will not work if editors do not give as well as take.
- Peer reviews are meant to examine not just the prose, but the sources and images used in the article.
- Feedback can range from brief comments after skimming through a page to a full blown dissection of grammar, structure, and references. Either way, every bit helps.
- Reviewing another editor's article can help sharpen your writing skills, which in turn can improve the articles you write.
See past discussions for details: VG discussion and MilHist discussion
|
- Things you can help with:
- Remember to add {{WikiProject Video games}} to every video game article, template, category, image and project page.
|
- Project Navigation
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
-
|
|
 To-do list for User:Jacoplane: |
edit · history · watch · refresh |
|
|
Last updated 09:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC) by Tangobot (maintained by Tangotango)
|
