Administrator instructions
Images and media for deletion (IfD) is for listing images which are unneeded. Images that have been listed here for more than 5 days are eligible for deletion if either a consensus to do so has been reached or no objections to deletion have been raised. Undeletion requests should be brought to deletion review.
If you have questions if something should be deleted, consider going to Wikipedia Media and Copyright Questions
To force the server to update this page immediately, purge the cache.
Instructions
What not to list here
I. For speedy deletion candidates, do not use this page; instead use {{db|reason}}. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates (where both images are on Wikipedia), thumbnails, broken images, non-existent images, non-commercial, "by permission" images and files which are not an image, sound file or video clip and have no encyclopedic use.
II. Images that have no source, or have an unknown copyright, or are unused or replaceable non-free, or are non-free without rationale can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the image page:
- {{subst:nsd}} if an image has no source indicated
- {{subst:nld}} if an image has a source but no licensing information
- {{subst:orfud}} if an image has a non-free copyright tag but isn't used in any articles
- {{subst:rfu}} if an image has a non-free copyright tag but could be replaced by a free image
- {{subst:dfu|reason}} if an image has a non-free copyright tag but the rationale isn't sufficient or is disputed
- {{subst:frn}} if an image has no non-free use rationale and was uploaded after May 4, 2006
III. Redundant or duplicate images do not have to be listed here. Please use
- {{isd|Full name of image excluding the "Image:" prefix}} for speedy deletion if the other image is on Wikipedia, not on Commons
- {{subst:ncd|image name on Commons}} if the image now exists on Commons, or {{subst:ncd}} for images with the same name on Commons
IV. For blatant copyright infringements, use speedy deletion by tagging the image {{db-i9}}
V. Suspected copyright violations shouldn't be listed here.
- If an image is listed as public domain or under a free license, but lacks verification of this (either by an OTRS ticket number or a notice on the source website), tag it as {{subst:npd}}.
- For other suspected copyright infringements or licensing issues, use Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images.
VI. Images that are hosted on Wikimedia Commons cannot be deleted via this process. Please use the Commons deletion page instead.
VII. If an image is appropriately licensed and could be usable elsewhere, consider copying them to the Wikimedia Commons instead of listing them for deletion. Once copied to the Commons, it is eligible for speedy deletion per criteria 8 for Images.
Listing images and media for deletion
To list an image:
| 1 |
Edit the image page.
Add {{ifd|log=2008 October 12}} to the image page.
|
| 2 |
Create its IfD subsection.
Follow this edit link and list the image at the bottom of that page using {{subst:Ifd2|Image_name.ext|Uploader= |Reason= }} ~~~~
If the image has been replaced by another image, also list that image in your reasons, in the format " Image1.jpg - obsoleted by Image2.jpg". Please refer below for a list of common reasons.
|
| 3 |
Give due notice.
Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst:idw|Image:Image_name.ext}}
-
- Remember to replace "Image_name.ext" with the name of the image or media
- For multiple images by the same user, use {{subst:idw-multi|Image:First_Image.ext|Image:Second_Image.ext|Image:Third_Image.ext}} ~~~~ (can handle up to 26)
If the image is in use, also consider adding {{ifdc|Image:Image_name.ext|log=2008 October 12}} to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages.
|
State the reasons why the image should be deleted. Some common reasons are:
- Obsolete - The image has been replaced by a better version. Indicate the new image name (often abbreviated OB)
- Orphan - The image is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. (If the image is only available under "fair use", please use {{subst:orfud}} instead). Please consider moving "good" free licensed images to Commons rather than outright deleting them, other projects may find a use for them even if we have none; you can also apply {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} . (often abbreviated OR, not to be confused with original research which generally doesn't apply to images)
- Unencyclopedic - The image doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia. Images used on userpages should generally not be nominated on this basis alone unless the user is violating the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy by using Wikipedia to host excessive amounts unencyclopedic material (most commonly private photos). (often abbreviated UE)
- Low quality - The image is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns. (often abbreviated LQ)
- Copyright violation - The image might be used in violation of copyright. (often abbreviated CV)
These are not the only "valid" reasons to delete an image. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones.
Since abbreviated deletion reasons will not be familiar to most Wikipedians, especially newbies, please consider using full words. A few extra keystrokes now can save paragraphs of explanation to a panicked uploader wondering what's wrong with their image.
If you remove an image from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the image should be deleted. This is necessary because image pages do not remember the articles on which the images were previously used (see talk page).
Instructions for discussion participation
In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:
Instructions for closing discussions
Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 5 days following the steps at Deletion Process.
Old discussions
The following discussions are more than 5 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:
For older nominations, see the archives.
Discussions approaching conclusion
Recent nominations
October 8
- Image:Marcusc2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Neal Scoggin (notify | contribs).
- Claimed as self-created but looks like either a modified derivative or a screenshot from something to me. Also unencyclopedic and unused. Uploader is long gone. Chick Bowen 00:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Sutton High Street2612051.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Areedef (notify | contribs).
- OR, questionable encyc. value SkierRMH (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Exquisite Corpse - D M A-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alan.me (notify | contribs).
- Image:Spring2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rul3rz (notify | contribs).
- OR, questionable encyc. value SkierRMH (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:MagiGig.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wato20 (notify | contribs).
- Image:Tent Map Orbit Magnification.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JimPhy (notify | contribs).
- OR, questionable encyc. value SkierRMH (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:=JosephRenzi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Neverlosty (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal photo. Not of great value to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 16:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:@mos.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zoebutt (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal photo. Not of great value to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 16:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:@ the Summit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Briankc43 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal photo. No ID of who these people are for article use. Not of great value to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 16:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:@Dublin edited.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DjSuchit (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal photo. Not of great value to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Goodsallj (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal photo. No identification of the subject. Not of great value to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 16:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Kikikiwi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dylanny (notify | contribs).
- Image:Juniperus_communis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MPF (notify | contribs).
- Image:05-04-06 0717.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spikebrennan (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned photo of train cars, lower quality. rootology (C)(T) 17:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Warren Truss.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timeshift9 (notify | contribs).
- Copyrighted picture of a living Australian Damiens.rf 17:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The licencing requirements are stated and complied with and use of the photo on wikipedia meets the fair dealing requirement. Unless an alterntive photo with a less restrictive licence can be found, I oppose deletion of this photo.--Takver (talk) 13:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- The non-free content policy says that "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created" (emphasis mine). It has generally been accepted that free portraits of living people, unless they are notorious recluses, could be created, even if none have been found or created yet. Indeed, it is even explicitly listed as an example in WP:NFC#Unacceptable use (images, example 12). Wikipedia is a project to create a free content encyclopedia. Using a non-free photo (even if the restrictions are mild, as in this case) where a free one could be obtained or created does not serve that goal. Instead, you might want to try contacting Warren Truss or his staff and requesting a free image. Or, heck, he's an Australian politician who presumably makes public appearances, you're an Australian Wikipedian interested in photography... —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:34, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Boatconstruction.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mark_Richards (notify | contribs).
- Image:AndrenReport.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timeshift9 (notify | contribs).
- Copyrighted book cover used just to show the living person displayed. The book is not even mentioned on Wikipedia. Damiens.rf 17:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Andren is dead. But in your haste to be a delete queen you didn't know that did you? Timeshift (talk) 21:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. The Andren report was originally his regular updates to his electors, which was then edited and combined for the book for a wider audience. Many people outside his electorate also read his regular Andren reports via his website. The book cover is significant as it reflects Andren's communication as an independent MP to his electors and the Australian people. It adds significant detail to the article on Peter Andren, even though the book (or the reports it is based upon) are not yet mentioned in the article.--Takver (talk) 13:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Dead people are generally not a good fit for the category of "living person", despite the efforts of users for whom reading the first line of an article appears to be a terrible struggle. Rebecca (talk) 07:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:RobinMillhouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timeshift9 (notify | contribs).
- Copyrighted picture of a living Australian Damiens.rf 17:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Gough on steps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CJ (notify | contribs).
- This copyrighted picture is not necessary for understanding the article discussing the important event it shows. Damiens.rf 17:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I strongly disagree. This photo is iconic and depicts an important moment in the 1975 constitutional crisis - Gough Whitlam's impromptu media conference on the steps of Parliament House. I think retention of the photo adds important detail to the article's content and should be retained under the existing 'fair dealing' copyright licence.--Takver (talk) 12:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per above. It is impossible to gain a free equivelent of such a photo of such an historic event. Timeshift (talk) 23:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- This nomination is not about WP:NFCC#1. If you can, please explain us how is this picture necessary for the understanding of the 1975 constitutional crisis. --Damiens.rf 07:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think I have to agree with Damiens.rf here: our non-free content policy says that "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Having read the article this image is used in, I have to say I don't feel that's the case here. Yes, it's a good image. Yes, it's evocative, at least when put in context (which the article as currently written doesn't really do, though). But it doesn't really tell the reader anything that the textual quotation of Whitlam's address at the bottom of the section entitled "The dismissal" (which I assume is what this image is depicting, though the article really doesn't even make this clear) would not already convey just as well or better. The article does not need this image. Per Wikipedia policy, that means we shouldn't use it, given that it's not free. So, delete. Ps. If I'm reading this page right, this picture appears to be under Crown copyright. If Wikipedia is still around in 17 years, we can put it back once the copyright has expired. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Truthofmatterlores small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timeshift9 (notify | contribs).
- Copyrighted book cover used to illustrate 2 articles. One of them mentions the book in just 1 phrase.The other one doesn't mention the book at all. Damiens.rf 17:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Joint1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timeshift9 (notify | contribs).
- This copyrighted picture showing politicians sitting together is not necessary for understanding the article discussing the important event it shows. Damiens.rf 17:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:000 Tim-Fischer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timeshift9 (notify | contribs).
- Copyrighted picture of living Australian Damiens.rf 17:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Iansinclair.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adam Carr (notify | contribs).
- Copyrighted picture of living Australian Damiens.rf 17:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. The copyright notice attached to the photo gives explicit permission for reproduction on Wikipedia for 'fair dealing'. If there is no photo in the public domain, then this photo should be retained. This copyright notice would appear to apply to all photos from the Australian parliamentary handbook, and I would therefore oppose deletion of any photo covered under this notice unless a reasonable alternative photo can be provided under a less restrictive licence. --Takver (talk) 13:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- "This photograph is from the Australian Parliamentary Handbook, and is held under Crown copyright by the Commonwealth of Australia. The responsible Commonwealth agency, AUSPIC, gave written permission on 2 August 2005 for this photograph to be used at Wikipedia (see following). The use of this image by Wikipedia is contended by Australian Wikipedians to be fair dealing in Australia and fair use in the United States. (Letter from AUSPIC to User:Adam Carr: "Dear Dr Carr, Approval is granted to reproduce images nominated below [photographs of Members, Senators and Governors-General appearing in current and past editions of the Parliamentary Handbook] on the Wikipedia website. Subsequent use by a third party will incur reproduction fees if that use is of a commercial nature. Copyright remains with AUSPIC. Peter West, Director, AUSPIC auspic@aph.gov.au)" - direct quote from the licensing info on the image page.--Takver (talk) 13:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:MarkVaile.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by George1966 (notify | contribs).
- Missing otrs confirmation for more than 12 months. Absent uploader. Damiens.rf 17:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Ken Jasper.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by George1966 (notify | contribs).
- Missing otrs confirmation for more than 12 months. Absent uploader Damiens.rf 17:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Russell Northe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by George1966 (notify | contribs).
- Missing otrs confirmation for more than 12 months. Absent uploader Damiens.rf 17:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Jeanette Powell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by George1966 (notify | contribs).
- Missing otrs confirmation for more than 12 months. Absent uploader. Unverifiable source. Damiens.rf 17:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Bill Sykes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by George1966 (notify | contribs).
- OTRS confirmation pending for more than 12 months. Absent uploader. Unverifiable source. Damiens.rf 17:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Peter Walsh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by George1966 (notify | contribs).
- OTRS confirmation pending for more than 12 months. Absent uploader. Unverifiable source. Damiens.rf 17:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Paul Weller.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by George1966 (notify | contribs).
- OTRS confirmation pending for more than 12 months. Absent uploader. Unverifiable source. Damiens.rf 17:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Amersfoortse_Kei.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joppe.arnold (notify | contribs).
- currently orphaned image (I notified wikiproject about possible licensing issue), was replaced on Amersfoort with Image:Kei2.jpg. The nominated image is tagged with a GFDL-presumed licnese. Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:PUNK.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Theflyingdutchdude (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal image. OsamaK 18:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:MasterIncarnations2007.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MatGreenfield (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned old uploaded image. OsamaK 18:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:05-04-06 0721.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spikebrennan (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned photo of train cars, lower quality. rootology (C)(T) 19:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:051210 Political Compass.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ElectricRay (notify | contribs).
- Unused orphaned graphic of a political compass test. No encyclopediac value. rootology (C)(T) 19:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:05-04-06 0720.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spikebrennan (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned low-quality image of train tracks. rootology (C)(T) 19:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:05Nov15 Palace at night.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by --TBAS (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal photo. Not of great value to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 19:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:05 tiki hut old.JPEG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ABecker (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal photo. Not of great value to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(