"Piping" means concealing the actual title of a linked article by replacing it with other text, typically to suppress parenthetical expressions.
A "redirect" is a special page used to "jump" readers from one page title to page with another title where the targeted article is located. For example, a redirect is used at the title 9/11 to send users who navigate there to the article at September 11 attacks.
In general, it is best not to use piping or redirects in disambiguation pages so that it is clear to the reader which article is being suggested, and so that they remain in control of the choice of article. However, there are circumstances where a redirect or piping is useful to the reader.
For foreign-language terms, be sure an article exists or could be written for the word or phrase in question. Usually this means that the term has been at least partially adopted into English or is used by specialists.
Tambo may refer to:
|
Avoid adding lines for words or phrases that are simply spelled the same as an English term. For example:
For people, include their birth and death years (when known), and only enough descriptive information that the reader can distinguish between different people with the same name. Keep in mind the conventions for birth and death dates—see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Dates of birth and death. Do not include a, an or the before the description of the person's occupation or role.
John Smith is the name of:
|
For places, it may only be necessary to write the name of the article.
| Jacksonville may refer to: |
It might be appropriate to add the country after the link. Leave the country unlinked.
Kimberley is the name of:
|
A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included on a disambiguation page when another article also includes that red link. There is no need to brainstorm all occurrences of the page title and create red links to articles that are unlikely ever to be written, or likely to be removed as insufficiently notable topics. To find out if another article uses the red link, click on it, and then click "What links here" on the toolbox on the left side of the page to see if any other articles use the red link. See Help:What links here for more information.
A disambiguation shouldn't be made up completely of red links or have only one blue link in it, because the purpose of disambiguation is solely to refer users to other Wikipedia pages. If the only article that uses the red link is the disambiguation page, unlink the "entry word" but still keep a blue link in the description.
Red links should not be the only link in a given entry; link also to an existing article, so that a reader (as opposed to a contributing editor) will have somewhere to navigate to for additional information. A (made-up) example:
| Flibbygibby may refer to: |
In this example, the architectural motif is judged to be appropriate for a future article, but the noodle is not.
If the link is to a synonym, simply use it as it is named:
| Serving spoon may also refer to: |
If the item described appears as part of another page, link to the relevant section of that page instead (using the #anchor notation) and conceal that by making it a piped link, as shown with "coin", below. In this case, the link may not start the line, but it should still be the only wikilink.
| Tail may also refer to: |
Only use this feature if the item being described actually appears on the page you are linking to, so avoid:
if the television article does not mention it.
In most cases, place the items in order of usage, with the most-used meanings appearing at the top and less common meanings below. A recommended order is:
Unless the list is quite short, separate the articles in categories (1) and (2) from those in (3) and (4), with the "may also be" line shown below:
Thingymabob may refer to:
Thingymabob may also be:
|
The list may be broken up by subject area:
|
Thingamajig may refer to: In science:
In world music:
|
Subject areas should be chosen to best aid navigation. Choose divisions that are well-defined, and that break the entries up into similarly-sized chunks. Very small divisions may impede navigation, and should usually be avoided. Disambiguation pages will frequently have an "Other uses" section for entries that don't fit neatly into another section. Keep in mind that a particular division scheme may not work equally well on all disambiguation pages.
Section headings may be used on longer lists instead of, or in addition to, bold subject area headings, but using more than a single level, as on Aurora (disambiguation), is rarely necessary. Section headings should not include links. See Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Headings for more.
On longer lists, {{TOCright}} may be used to move the table of contents to the right hand side of the page. This reduces the amount of white space and may improve the readability of the page. (For more information, see Help:Section#Floating the TOC.)
Including images is discouraged unless they aid in selecting between articles. Examples of this are the images at Congo and Mississippi Delta (disambiguation).
There may be a "See also" section which can include:
When appropriate, easily confused terms can be placed in a hatnote.
Depending on the type of disambiguation page, there are different templates to use, including {{disambig}} for general use, {{geodis}} for locations, {{hndis}} for human names, {{numberdis}} for number-related pages, and {{mathdab}} for mathematics pages. However, if the page encompasses multiple topics, {{disambig}} should be used to avoid confusion.
Place the appropriate template after all of the content sections (disambiguation entries and See also entries) and before any Categories (see below) or interlanguage links. {{disambig}} produces the following message (as of December 2006), and also assigns the Category:Disambiguation to the page.
If a disambiguation page needs cleaning up to bring it into conformance with this style manual, use {{disambig-cleanup}}. This replaces both {{disambig}} and {{cleanup-date}}.
Do not use {{subst:disambig}} or {{subst:disambig-cleanup}}, as the contents of this notice may change in the future (see Wikipedia:Transclusion costs and benefits). Also, the Wikipedia software relies on links to the templates to determine which pages are disambiguation pages (see MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage), and subst'ing breaks this feature.
If topical categorization of the disambiguation page seems to be needed, please bring this need up for discussion at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation. Experience has shown that ad hoc and un-discussed category creation is controversial and prone to create agitation among the many editors working in the area of disambiguation. Be bold, but as that exhortation warns, don't be reckless.
Categories aid navigation between articles. However, disambiguation pages are non-articles and do not require categorization other than for maintenance purposes; they already get auto-categorized by using {{disambig}}, {{hndis}} and {{geodis}}. No other categories should be added, except Category:Surnames, Category:Given names or their subcategories (if the disambiguation page includes sections of name information or lists of people), or disambiguation subcategories that might apply.
Set index articles are list articles about a set of items that have similar or identical names. Set index articles are disambiguation-like pages that do not obey the style outlined on this page. Note that the set index article exception was designed to be narrow: for pages that contains links to articles about different topics, please follow this style guide for disambiguation pages. One example of a set index article is a list of ships with the same name. For more information about such ship lists, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines#Index pages.
Some disambiguation pages with "(disambiguation)" in the title list only two meanings, one of them being the primary meaning. In such cases, the disambiguation page is not strictly necessary, but is harmless. The recommended practice is to use a hatnote on the article for the primary meaning to link directly to the secondary meaning.
For every style suggestion above, there is some page which has a good reason to do something else. These guidelines are intended for consistency, but usefulness to the reader is the principal goal. So ignore these guidelines if you have a good reason.
No comments have been added.